My group and I’s main topic was to focus on the recurring genres or literary works within a specific generation , a group of 5 years based on the year of graduation. I chose to focus from 2010-2015. The following post will be divided into the following sections: Trying my luck with Palladio, Main Finding, Conclusion, Limitations, Improvements, and Reflection.
Trying my luck with Palladio
Palladio allows the user to choose multiple fields using the same data and can display information in different ways. My two most used modes where the table and the graph. The graph constructs networks out of dot and lines, similar to constellations, except you can see them clearly anytime of the day.
Playing around with the Palladio revealed to me the following findings:
-The novel genre is quite popular and stirred up various emotions.
-Looking at fiction, the emotion “paranoid”caught my eye, bringing to my attention that I weakly associate the feeling of paranoia with fiction.
So I went back to the excel sheet and discovered it was 1984 by George Orwell that was the culprit. Makes sense.
-Speaking of 1984, on it’s own, the novel derived a wide range of emotions and is one of the most popular books according to the data.
-Boredom was one of the most prevalent emotions according to the data-
Wait a minute
Not all books will move you or have you reading until dawn but I couldn’t help but see what books were causing those who belonged to this generation bored. Referring to the networks, various titles (Anna Karenina, To Kill a Mockingbird, etc) are linked to the emotion boredom and these books all have a particular genre in common: they are all classics.
Prior this project, I knew reading Western classical literature was not far-fetched within high schools and the network strengthens this claim since the genre “Classic” appears linked to ST (school time), meaning classics were mostly read when it was assigned to students(there are two exceptions).
Narrowing it down, it was found that boredom was a common emotion linking the classics.
I think one of the contributing factors of why boredom is highly affiliated with classical literature is the type of language. The language used tends to be bulky and written in an “older English”. Also, slang is minimal or perhaps very different from our modern day colloquy. In other words, the English language continuously changes and so it becomes more difficult to read older text. I recall struggling with 1984 at the beginning because I wasn’t accustomed to George Orwell’s writing style. I also think some classics fall under the risk of dragging on and if the reader isn’t engaged, the person is likely to drop the novel before the climax.
For further understanding I called up two people I had interviewed in the beginning. LS confirmed that western classical literature was taught throughout her senior year and supported my finding by claiming boredom. She elaborated by saying that although different books were covered, the teacher would use a similar method of analyzing each text. Moreover, the repetition or similarity of themes and morals of the books contributed to her boredom.
MY: What would you do to make it more interesting?
LS: Change the teaching method
Turns out LS’s sister, NS, is currently a senior at the same high school and new books have been added to the literature curriculum. However, after describing the teaching method and the class dynamic, LS confirmed that there wasn’t much of a difference .
Furthermore, in regards to the analysis, NS commented that they, the students, weren’t expected to contribute to the discussion. She might have been joking but it is probably one of the contributing factors to the lecture style of teaching these works.
I called another person I had interviewed but couldn’t input his data because Google Maps couldn’t give me his high school’s coordinates. Although he was taught Armenian Literature, the same issue occurred. His boredom stemmed from the lack of diversity in authors despite taking different works. Also, There wasn’t much room for students to deliver their inputs since it was lecture based.
MY: What would you do to make it more interesting?
VM: Contextualize a lot more. Talk about the moment in time these people were writing and why specifically they became canon in Armenian Literature. Not simply say theye are and stop there.
I also asked in their opinion, why they think these books stay within academia, and both gave me different answers. One said that its linked to the school’s prestige. I didn’t refute this because prestige is considered important in Lebanese society.
The other said it was because these works are canon and that for one to be well-versed in literature, these works still need to be studied, especially works written by those who contributed to elevating the importance of this field.
Which reasoning do you agree with? Both maybe?
Based on the data and the networks, classical literature is usually read when it is assigned to students. Though this ensures that these works remain in canon, those who graduated from the year 2010-2015 seem to leave high school remembering how bored they were in class more than the morals these books supposedly teach. Based on the two phone interviews, it seems the repetitive method of teaching and lack of encouraged involvement may be contributing to the prevalent feeling of boredom when reading the classics.
- Although it provides a direction, my data is not very representative. I only interviewed one person from an older generation and I didn’t interview anyone from public schools.
- Anomalies: Palladio and Carto are quite sensitive. For Example, Palladio differentiates the same word if it’s entered beginning with a small letter or with a capital letter.
- I didn’t attend high school here and so I have to rely on other people’s high school experience, which subjects my results to bias or to constructed memory.
- More phone interviews in regards to classical literature should have been carried out.
- I was unable to gain the perspective of an English high school teacher.
Since this project will likely continue next semester for a new group of students, I suggest the following improvements:
- Just as how ensuring one group member is familiar with WordPress to help others who aren’t, perhaps one person in each group should be appointed to enter the data. That will minimize the variations of text from 20 different possible people to a maximum of six (if you were to keep the size of the groups the same.) It doesn’t sound like an attractive position, so maybe you could have the student’s name randomly generated.
- Considering the criteria we had to fill, I think asking the interviewees the name of the general area of their high school would be helpful because Google maps doesn’t provide the coordinates for some schools in Lebanon. At least, a general location would be provided and it could help validate the coordinates provided or help us realize that the coordinates on Google/Carto maps are way off.
- Make space for a re-interviewing stage. Based on my experience, this helped provide more insight.
This project demonstrates the canonicity of Western classical literature within Lebanese high school academia. It is understandable since authors like Shakespeare contributed to the growth of literature but I’m left wondering which writers or poets pushed forward Lebanese literature or literature within Lebanon.
It’s beneficial to teach Western Literature but based on the data not much space is provided for works written by Lebanese writers within private schools, making it harder to deduce what work of literature written by a Lebanese or culture-specific to Lebanon would be considered canon. However, based on the data, Khalil Gibran’s work is mentioned and so if I where to vouch for any author it would be him.
My main finding illustrates that canonicity doesn’t necessarily mean that the work is well liked or guaranteed proper integration when passed onto the next generation. It seems how these works are taught needs to be improved to ensure the coming generations actually understand the value of these works. Additionally, I think finding ways to make the content relatable to high school students could help with them engage with the classics. For example, use 1984 as a way to talk about constant surveillance as a similarity between the book and their lives. Of course, finding a link is not a guaranteed possibility for all works of Classical literature but it doesn’t hurt to try. Minimum, students should be encouraged to participate rather than spoon fed the teachings of these works.
Frankly, students shouldn’t have to wait to be in a university classroom to be able to engage with literature.
- Based on your personal experience, if you found yourself dozing off midway a classic, why so?
- Other than the reasons mentioned, can you think of another reason why western classical literature remains in high school academia?
- If you were to add a non-classic literary work to a literature curriculum what would it be? Why?
(you can answer as many as you like below in the comments)